Difference between political affairs, public affairs, and public relations

Difference between political affairs, public affairs, and public relations

Often we get asked what is it that we do – exactly.  It is difficult to answer that in a elevator speech, but the best I have come up with is “We manage political affairs by  understanding and shaping political environments.  Ozean does this through research, data, message development, and media.”

So, public affairs?  Not exactly. but kinda.

So, public relations?  Not exactly, but kinda.

So, you do politics?  Yes.

What is Public Relations?

Public Relations or PR is the practice of managing an organization’s reputation and building relationships with its publics.  In theory, it is much broader than garnering press coverage, but in most smaller PR shops, they believe managing a organization’s reputation is primary done through the media.

What is Public Affairs?

Public Affairs is one hand a subset of public relations in that is target audiences are generally those involved in crafting public policy and on the other hand at times broader than public relations in that it works to build relationships with more than just media reporters such as lawmakers and regulators. Cynically, Public Affairs is what political operatives are called when laws won’t allow governments to hire public relations firms. 

What is Political Affairs?

Political affairs is the practice of influencing government policy and legislation via all legal means. At times this can be inside the building and at other times outside the building.

This means, depending on the situation, political affairs professionals could be identifying and targeting not only political elites but also public opinion.  Our activities could also be an attempt to bring indirect pressure on the process.

We do this through:

Research:  Can take the form of surveys, focus groups, and generating data sets or  studies and reports to be used in the process.  In addition, properly identifying all stakeholders can be a crucial and painstaking process.

Data:  This can be part of research or can be part of building and augmenting data sets to reach digital audiences.   Very often data services are intertwined with Research services.

Message Development:  developing persuasive messaging in today’s hyper-partisan and polarized political environment is much more delicate – often being nuanced to each identified stakeholder.

Media:  creating and executing media plans – whether paid or earning – whether in a traditional media or digital media – is in a sense putting it all together.

Shaping Political Environments

In a sense this at the heart of what Ozean does – shaping political environments, and it includes things that don’t always fall neatly into research, data, message development, or media.  We use all our knowledge to understand the political process and decide what levers to pull or sometimes more importantly not pull to win. 

After deliberate research, Ozean identifies the stakeholders and conceives different tactics to manage a clients activities and messaging to win.    At times, those activities don’t fall neatly into the services commonly thought of performed by public relations or public affairs officials.  These political operations could be before the voting, during the voting, or after the voting because frankly we believe that politics never stops.    

At times, we wear all the hats, but depending upon the scope and size of the project and because we understand all facets of the process, Ozean may act at the organization that assembles the team and coordinates efforts.

Political Affairs

So now you know the difference between political affairs, public affairs, and public relations.    All three fields play important roles in helping organizations achieve their goals, but they have distinct approaches and target different audiences.

 

Political Affairs: More Than Just Public Relations

Political Affairs: More Than Just Public Relations

In the bustling world of politics, where power and influence dance in a delicate waltz, a crucial role is played by those who navigate the intricate web of relationships and perceptions – the political affairs professionals. Often misconstrued as mere public relations practitioners, political affairs specialists possess a unique blend of expertise that extends far beyond crafting press releases and managing media relations.

Navigating the Political Landscape

Political affairs professionals are the strategists who guide organizations through the complex political landscape, ensuring their interests are not only heard but also considered in the decision-making process. They are the architects of influence, deftly weaving relationships with key stakeholders, from elected officials and government bureaucrats to industry leaders and community groups.

While public relations focuses on shaping public perception and maintaining a positive image, political affairs delve into the nitty-gritty of public policy development, legislation. and or regulatory environments. They are the advocates who champion their clients’ causes, presenting compelling arguments and building consensus among policymakers.

Beyond Press Coverage: A Multifaceted Role

The realm of political affairs encompasses a diverse range of activities, extending far beyond the realm of press coverage. Here’s a glimpse into the multifaceted role of a political affairs professional:

Identifying Stakeholders:  Identifying stakeholders, often with indirect associations, are the key to success or failure.

Lobbying: Engaging with policymakers to promote or oppose specific legislation or policies.

Grassroots Mobilization: Activating supporters to voice their concerns and influence decision-making.

Coalition Building: Forming alliances with like-minded organizations to advance shared goals.

Issue Management: Identifying and addressing potential challenges or crises that could impact the organization’s interests.

Demystifying the “Political” Aspect

The term “political” often carries a negative connotation, conjuring images of backroom deals and partisan maneuvering. However, in the context of political affairs, it is more about understanding and navigating the political process to achieve positive outcomes for the organization and its stakeholders.

Political affairs professionals are not merely spin doctors or political operators; they are experts in understanding the motivations and dynamics of the political sphere. They possess a keen understanding of the political process, the players involved, and the levers of influence that can be employed to shape policy and opinion.

A Crucial Role in the Modern World

In today’s increasingly interconnected world, where government policies and regulations have far-reaching impacts on businesses, communities, and individuals, the role of political affairs has become more critical than ever. Organizations across industries recognize the need for strategic engagement with the political system to protect their interests, promote their values, and contribute to a more informed and engaged public discourse.

Political affairs professionals play a pivotal role in bridging the gap between the private sector and the public arena, ensuring that diverse perspectives are heard and considered in the decision-making process. They are the architects of influence, the advocates for change, and the guardians of a well-functioning democracy.

Simply put, political affairs practicioners are much more than writers and distributors of press releases.  

Science, Doubt, and Hucksters

Science, Doubt, and Hucksters

This weekend I took my son to see the movie Oppenheimer.  Our car-ride discussion centered around the process the scientists went through and how vicious their disagreements turned.   My son was floored by how ‘teammates’ were so ‘adversarial.’  I said welcome to ‘science.’

Unless you have served on a local committee to name a new church pastor, you haven’t seen petty fights until you observe the academic arena.  But here is the thing, the “fight” is the process of science. 

Science is never settled; doubt and skepticism are always part of the process.   When a new paper comes out, even if it challenges conventional wisdom only slightly, scientists tend to tear it apart.  They rejoice in dissecting the methodologies, assumptions, and conclusions.  

The uncertainty is especially pronounced in the social sciences because human behavior is so messy and difficult to replicate. 

Recently, I listened to a podcast ironically entitled “Not Another Politics Podcast” produced by the University of Chicago.  It was an interview with the authors, David E. Broockman and Joshua Kalla about their paper “Consuming cross-cutting media causes learning and moderates attitudes: A field experiment with Fox News viewers” 

The hosts had an insightful interview with the lead author and in fairness discussed the caveats and potential additional research needed.  After the interview ended, the three hosts spent the next half or so of the podcast expanding on the criticisms of the paper’s findings. 

If you don’t understand the process, one would think the hosts were jerks.  Rather than being jerks, the hosts were attempting to understand where this experiment fit into the body of literature, what questions are unanswered, and what additional research should / needs to be done to add nuance and enrich the body of knowledge.

And yes, this process is messy, and yet it is normal and expected in the academic world. 

The scientific process

  • Make Observations
  • Ask Questions / Develop Hypotheses
  • Test Hypotheses (experiments, surveys, case studies, observational studies, meta-studies)
  • Analyze Data
  • Draw Conclusions
  • Communicate findings
  • Start all over

For academics, this is the process:  Nerd fights, and I appreciate it.  In fact, I love it.  Over time, it is this process that leads to a richer understanding, nullification of errors, and scientific advances.    

At times, the search for knowledge turns personal and petty, but most of the time it is a good-faith effort to advance the entire body of knowledge or at least win a debate.    

However,  the scientific process allows charlatans, hucksters, and scoundrels to feed the public or their tribe bullshit. 

These hacks use the uncertainty inherent in the process to disparage the knowledge, the process, and the participants.  And frustratingly, they often know better. 

It is this exact process that allows bad-faith actors like the good ol tobacco companies to operate.

COVID and Scientific Process

COVID is an example.  When COVID was new, there was a lot of uncertainty.  When COVID vaccines were being developed and new, there was a lot more uncertainty.  And as COVID matures and mutates, we start the entire process over again….and again….and again.

Green Energy and Scientific Process

It is also one of the larger mistakes advocates make when discussing green energy and climate change: “The science is settled!” is absolutely a strategic communication mistake.   By definition, the science is never settled. 

Anyone can point to any number of esoteric debates about climate models, data, and study methodologies that demonstrate “doubt” about climate science.   And each time one does, they can rightfully mock those that exclaim the “science is settled!”

An interesting example is a deeper dive into researcher Roger Pielke’s career.     

It’s the Intent

While questioning science is critical to the process, the intent matters. 

Is one trying to suggest additional lines of inquiry, or write a clickbait article to serve a political purpose, or enrage you on cable news? 

Admittedly, communicating about science is difficult.    However, one thing is certain – the scientific process is never settled.   

Conclusion

I learned a lot in grad school, nothing more important than how to be a healthy skeptic and that studies are not to be accepted at face value AND yet that doesn’t mean they are false.  Because the other critical question I learned in grad school “When faced with two seemingly contradictory findings, ask yourself, under what conditions can both findings be true?”

Welcome to science son.  It is vicious and works…eventually.

Additional Reading

For political nerds see Alan Abramowitz versus Morris Fiorina on polarization.  Essentially, Fiorina argues that polarization is largely limited to the political elite, while Abramowitz argues that it has spread to the mass public.  They have spent years sniping at each other over data sources, measurement, interpretation of data, the unit of analysis, and seemingly the color yellow.    

What is Political Affairs? A Comprehensive Definition

What is Political Affairs? A Comprehensive Definition

Political affairs is the process of shaping the political environment for government officials, elected representatives, interest groups, media, and any other relevant stakeholders. It involves creating, executing, and managing strategies and tactics to influence the decision-making process of those in power.

At its core, political affairs is a mixture of public relations and public affairs, with a focus on the political landscape. In the United States, political affairs often involves engaging with elected officials and other government representatives, as well as their staff members, to advance the interests of a particular group or organization.

Political affairs is essential for organizations that want to have an impact on public policy, regulation, and legislation. It requires a comprehensive understanding of the political environment, as well as the ability to communicate effectively with those in power. Political affairs professionals must be able to navigate the complex political landscape, develop targeted messaging, and build strong relationships with stakeholders.

At Ozean Media, we specialize in political affairs, providing our clients with the expertise and insights needed to succeed in the political arena. Our approach is based on data, research, and media skills, allowing us to create targeted audiences and deliver precisely targeted communications and messaging.

We work closely with lobbying firms and in-house public relations teams to maximize our strengths and provide our clients with the most comprehensive services possible. Our focus on research, data, and media allows us to provide a unique perspective on political affairs and deliver measurable results for our clients.

Political Affairs – In Conclusion

In conclusion, political affairs is an essential component of any organization’s strategy for success in the political arena. It requires a comprehensive understanding of the political landscape, targeted messaging, and the ability to build strong relationships with stakeholders. At Ozean Media, we are committed to providing our clients with the expertise and insights they need to succeed in the political arena.

Contact us today to learn more about how we can help your organization succeed in the world of political affairs.

If you are in the market for a strategic, long-term political affairs partner for your organization, trade association, or corporation / company, Ozean is eager to speak with you.

Our easy-to-use appointment scheduling tool makes it simple to find a time that works for you.

Affective Partisanship – Why do you hate me?

Affective Partisanship – Why do you hate me?

I hope you had a great 4th of July.  As a true nerd, I spent some time looking at American National Election Studies (ANES) data.  For those unfamiliar with the data, it began at the University of Michigan and now is a jointly done with Stanford.  The survey research is conducted prior and after Presidential elections – often asking the same questions over multiple series.

It is a treasure trove of data, open to the public, and if you are unfamiliar with the data set, check it out.

Because, if you find yourself with a free weekend and a curiosity, you may be able to tease out some interesting finds.

This is where I found myself.  I was thinking again about the hyper-partisan political times we find ourselves in and playing around with ANES data.

ANES has used a feeling thermometer to measure how people feel about the political parties.  On a scale of 0 – 100, how do you feel about the _____ party?

I looked at a panel that collapsed party identification to inlclude those that leaned towards one party or the other. 

 

Observations

Just a couple of quick observations:

  • On average, Republicans like their own party slightly less than Democrats like theirs.
  • Independents are really just going to independent – they don’t really like either party.  (makes sense, if they did like one, they’d likely join one…)
  • After 2000, that seems to be the date things really changed.  
  • The hyper-partisanship appears mostly driven by negative partisanship. 

Big picture, on average – how we feel about our own party hasn’t changed THAT much.  It wouldn’t explain what we see in today’s politics. 

However, how we feel about the OTHER party has nose-dived after 2000.  And it is / has happened on both sides of the aisle. 

It appears the parties have sorted, closed ranks, and now the change in our politics is defined by what we don’t like. 

So, You Want to Run As an Independent or Third-Party Candidate?

So, You Want to Run As an Independent or Third-Party Candidate?

So, you want to run as a third party or independent?

Best of Luck!

For whatever reason, one of the most read blog posts on this website is an explanation of why third parties don’t win. 

Long story short – the deck is completely stacked against them.

But like any good critical thinker, we may want to reframe the question and ask: “Under what conditions DO third party or independent candidates win?”

Because we all know, while rare, third party or independent candidates do win.

      • They tend to come with established high, hard name-id. Normally originating outside politics.   Say maybe pro-wrestling, business, and / or athletics.
      • They tend to be wealthy. As discussed, ideological donors are typically highly partisan.  Institutional donors are odds players.  Typically, independent or third party candidates need sustainable seed money to get the campaign off the ground.
      • They tend to be lucky…I mean …. They tend to be at the right place at the right time. If you look closely, independents win when one of the major party candidates is fatally flawed – either entering the campaign or during the campaign.
      • They tend to be running for lower offices. Currently, there are major party apparatuses established for Senate, House, Governors, Attorneys General level campaigns.

Conclusion

We try not to think in binary terms (win / lose) – because as soon as you say “So-and-so can’t win!”, you end up embarrassed.  Rather, we try and think in probabilistic terms.

After all, any given hand can win at any time, but skill and politics wins in the long run – unless you are really unlucky.

Even if the above conditions 1-4 are met, it remains highly unlikely a third party or independent candidate wins – especially in these highly polarized political times.  There is nothing binding the Independent “tribe” together other than rejection of both parties and all the other candidates.