Land development is a complex and multi-faceted process that involves a wide range of considerations, from zoning laws and environmental regulations to market demand and financial feasibility. However, one important factor that is often overlooked in the due diligence process for land developers is the political landscape in which the development will take place. In this blog post, we argue that political affairs must be part of the due diligence process for land developers, and explore the reasons why.
First and foremost, political affairs can have a significant impact on the success or failure of a land development project. From obtaining the necessary permits and approvals to securing financing and navigating community opposition, the political landscape can shape every aspect of the development process. As such, it is crucial for land developers to understand the political climate in which they are operating, and to have a strategy in place for engaging with stakeholders and navigating potential obstacles.
Moreover, political affairs can also have long-term implications for the viability of a land development project. For example, changes in zoning laws or environmental regulations can make it more difficult or expensive to develop a particular piece of land, while changes in local leadership or community sentiment can make it harder to obtain the necessary permits and approvals. By staying abreast of political developments and engaging with key stakeholders, land developers can better anticipate and adapt to these potential challenges.
In addition to these practical considerations, there are also ethical and community reasons why political affairs should be part of the due diligence process for land developers. Land development projects can have significant impacts on the communities in which they are located, particularly in terms of access to affordable housing, environmental quality, and economic development. As such, it is important for land developers to engage with local stakeholders and to consider the broader social and ethical implications of their projects.
Finally, including political affairs in the due diligence process can also help to mitigate risk and ensure a more sustainable and successful project in the long run. By engaging with local stakeholders and building relationships with key decision-makers, land developers can help to foster a more collaborative and transparent development process, which can reduce the likelihood of legal or reputational issues down the line.
In conclusion, political affairs must be part of the due diligence process for land developers. By staying abreast of political developments, engaging with local stakeholders, and considering the broader social and ethical implications of their projects, land developers can help to ensure a more sustainable and successful development process, while mitigating risk and fostering positive relationships with the communities in which they operate.
If you are in the market for a strategic, long-term political affairs partner for your organization, trade association, or corporation / company, Ozean is eager to speak with you.
Our easy-to-use appointment scheduling tool makes it simple to find a time that works for you.
NIMBYism, or “Not In My Back Yard,” is a term used to describe the opposition to a proposed development or project in one’s own community. NIMBYism can be a major obstacle for land developers and commercial real-estate developers, as it can lead to delays, increased costs, and even the cancellation of projects.
There are a number of public relations strategies and tactics that can be used to prevent NIMBYism. These strategies and tactics can be used to educate the public about the benefits of a proposed development, to build relationships with community leaders, and to address the concerns of local residents.
Strategies and Tactics
Educate the public about the benefits of a proposed development. One of the best ways to prevent NIMBYism is to educate the public about the benefits of a proposed development. This can be done through public meetings, presentations, and media outreach. It is important to focus on the positive impacts that the development will have on the community, such as job creation, increased tax revenue, and improved infrastructure.
Build relationships with community leaders. Another important strategy for preventing NIMBYism is to build relationships with community leaders. This includes local elected officials, business leaders, and religious leaders. By building relationships with these leaders, you can gain their support for your project and help to mitigate any opposition.
Address the concerns of local residents. It is important to listen to the concerns of local residents and to address them in a thoughtful and respectful way. This may involve providing additional information about the project, offering mitigation measures, or making changes to the project design. By addressing the concerns of local residents, you can build trust and support for your project.
Conclusion
NIMBYism can be a major obstacle for land developers and commercial real-estate developers. However, by using public relations strategies and tactics, you can help to prevent NIMBYism and build support for your projects.
By educating the public about the benefits of your project, building relationships with community leaders, and addressing the concerns of local residents, you can increase your chances of success.
The ‘@’ Award & Twitter Power Users Ranking of Florida’s Elected Officials
Today Ozean announces 1) the 2023 Twitter Power Users of Florida’s Elected Officials Ranking and 2)The ‘@’ Award.
“It is no secret that significant political communication is happening on Twitter, and Ozean Media is studying the various ways Legislators use or don’t use Twitter to communicate. During this process, we have developed a method to quantify and acknowledge the power-users of Twitter of Florida’ elected officials,” said Alex Patton of Ozean Media.
Twitter Power Rankings
2023 Twitter Power Users of Florida’s Elected Officials Ranking acknowledges the top 10 power users of Twitter for the Florida House, Senate, executive branch, and federal branch.
The ‘@’ Award will be presented to the top power user of Twitter as measured for the time period of Florida’s regularly scheduled session. After session concludes, The ‘@’ Award will be presented to the top-ranked state Representative and Senator.
“We understand there is a risk in studying Twitter with the current environment and changes with the platform, but we want to attempt to better understand how elected officials are using Twitter. We hope the Power Ranking is a first step,” concluded Ben Torpey of Ozean Media.
The initial rankings will be computed using the time-period of Feb 20, 2023 – March 3, 2023, and will be released Friday, March 3 at 3 pm.
The rankings for The ‘@’ Award will only cover the time-period of Florida’s regular session (March 5 – May 7 or Florida Session’s sine die whichever is later). New rankings are computed and published every Friday during the special session at 3pm.
Leaderboards for Florida’s executive branch and federal branch are also compiled and ranked but are not eligible for The ‘@’ Award in 2023.
Given a specified time interval and a list of Twitter handles, the algorithm assigns a tailored weighting to variables including tweets, retweets, replies, follower count, following count, and effective reach.
The leaderboard is updated weekly and then displayed as an ascending order ranking. Only the top 10 are released.
How can Republicans overcome self funding celebrities or popular businesspersons?
Why would we?
A celebrity or popular business person begins with one or two the most valuable things in politics – name ID & money.
If a celebrity brings multi-millions in name ID then that is money a campaign can spend on other things other than establishing a bio.
For example, I don’t know Tim Tebow outside his press, but if he wanted to run for a Congressional seat in NW Florida, he would start with a massive advantage. He would start on third base and sometimes depending on context that is enough. Would he be a good candidate? No idea.
If a self-funding popular business person brings millions to the table that is valuable time a campaign can spend on other things. Early money is one of the largest early strategic advantages a campaign can have.
I think what you are really asking is how can we overcome running terrible self-funding celebrities or terrible popular businesspersons, right? The answer is stop supporting them.
How can Republicans become the party of the majority again?
In some places the Republicans are a majority and in some places even a super-majority, but I think you are asking about national / presidential politics.
A multi-part answer:
Better candidates: As we have seen, and will likely see today, name ID combined with terrible candidate quality isn’t a great combination.
Govern: The American people want their government to look slightly better than a middle school cafeteria food fight (well most of us do). A Congress that can govern would go a long way.
STOP the stupid shit: Stop enabling the antisemitic, racist, 4chan crowds.
Suburban Women : right now this seems to be the vote most in flux. They are picking of the less of two scary versions and you never want to mess with moms.
Embrace the Democrats mistakes. As they have shown, there will be many.
Conclusion
Celebrity or self – funded candidates aren’t necessarily a terrible thing, and they can offer tremendous advantages. Let’s just stop picking and promoting terrible ones.
The question asked is “What will it take for federal regulators to actually exercise their authority? (e.g. DoJ & Antitrust, SEC & insider trading, EPA & fracking/pipelines)?”
Ahhhh, regulators. One the most boring, yet critical functions of government.
Government Regulation
Conservatives have a default answer for most federal regulators – fire them all or weaken them to the point of irrelevance. They often say ‘no’ or ‘maybe’ ad-nauseum slowing us down, and they seemingly have zero interest in the time value of money. Frankly, some of this reputation is 100% earned. I once walked into a meeting with a client to meet with a regulator/government staff, and my client was greeted with a “Man, we haven’t bankrupted you yet? Ha Ha.” It wasn’t funny.
But I don’t think me railing against government bureaucracy is the point of your question. So, to explore your question, lets agree that the federal regulators that you speak of are fine upstanding government servants carrying out their charge to the best of their abilities.
Our agency has done work in the clean energy space and land development space and this comprises most of our experience. I will say for the record, most of upper staff members in these spaces are smart as heck and understand the bureaucratic process. I am almost always appreciative of their expertise in their fields.
BUT…..the appointment officials of regulatory bodies often leave a lot to be desired for because of the concept of “regulatory capture.”
One must never forget, at its heart, the appointed officials were appointed because they at the time of their appointment aligned with the current administration. These are political bodies. Three phrases: Pipelines, Joe Machin, FERC Chairman.
And it is the politics that leads to regulatory capture.
Florida: An Example of Regulatory Capture
Let me give you an example in Florida – The Florida Public Service Commission (PSC). This body is to regulate utilities in the State of Florida. They are to be the safeguard, patrolling if Florida’s monopoly utility industry is justified in their actions & requests. These people are routinely making multi-million if not billion-dollar decisions, and in my opinion are 100% captured by the utility industry.
Florida’s monopoly utilities dominate the communities they operate in by steering philanthropic donations to key groups, sponsoring everything from business conventions to little league teams.
The PSC is to have a citizen’s advocate or the office of public counsel. The legislature promptly removed the lawyer who kind of, tepidly fought against utility rate increases – at least making them work for it. Yeah, he was replaced by a lobbyist from the utility industry.
And finally, this system of Legislative nomination, executive branch appointment, and PSC regulation allows everyone to shirk any responsibility. Especially, with elected officials getting to blame the faceless bureaucrats at the PSC avoiding any electoral blame.
Put in the simplest of terms – the entire game is rigged.
Why does this regulatory capture exist? Because the incentives are there and extremely high. The monopoly utilities are going to act like monopolies by using all their power and money to reward supporters, punish defectors, buy the love of people who are indifferent, and influence the process. The financial gains are too high (remember BILLIONS) for them to do anything else. Monopolies and massive industries (pharma, energy, banking, etc) are going to do everything they can legally (and in gray areas) to win.
As you see in Florida, we have a complete failure of Florida’s regulatory ‘system’ due to nearly complete regulatory capture.
Frankly, the PSC is so unresponsive to Florida’s ratepayers and Florida’s citizens this is why I wrote an op-ed calling for the way we organize this body – changing from an appointed position to an elected position. It is unlikely to happen or even get off the ground.
Political Science hasn’t spent a lot of time researching this phenomenon and there are no simple answers.
It is unlikely regulatory capture is ever eliminated; more likely we need to work to minimize it.
Some have called for deregulation (my personal default), others have called for making these regulators answer to the public, but I would think that in this case, the lowest hanging fruit is the creating/making the watchdog or “Office of Public Counsel” more independent and interdisciplinary – almost like an Inspector General office.
You may also be able to tell, I am completely cynical about the odds of any positive change happening. With most of these systems, the incentives are all aligned against the “exercise of their authority.”
It could be argued that Florida’s monopoly utility industry had the absolute worst years with scandal after scandal. They are likely to get most if not all, they are asking for from Florida’s ‘regulatory body.’
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.