Call +1 352-376-0505

Florida Redistricting – 2026 Congressional

New 2026 District Comparison

DISTRICT Rep Name Party Old_PRE_REP New_PRE_REP Rep_change Old_PRE_DEM New_PRE_DEM Dem_change old_delta new_delta Change
1 Jimmy Patronis R  68.3% 68.3% 0.0% 30.7% 30.7% 0.0% 37.6% 37.6% 0.0%
2 Neal Dunn R  59.8% 59.8% 0.0% 39.2% 39.2% 0.0% 20.6% 20.6% 0.0%
3 Kat Cammack R  62.0% 62.0% 0.0% 37.1% 37.1% 0.0% 24.9% 24.9% 0.0%
4 Aaron Bean R  56.0% 56.0% 0.0% 43.0% 43.0% 0.0% 13.0% 13.0% 0.0%
5 John Rutherford R  59.9% 59.9% 0.0% 38.9% 38.9% 0.0% 21.0% 21.0% 0.0%
6 Randy Fine R  64.7% 64.7% 0.0% 34.5% 34.5% 0.0% 30.2% 30.2% 0.0%
7 Cory Mills R  56.0% 56.0% 0.0% 42.9% 42.9% 0.0% 13.0% 13.0% 0.0%
8 Mike Haridopolos R  61.1% 57.2% -3.9% 38.0% 41.6% 3.6% 23.2% 15.6% -7.5%
9 Darren Soto D  47.6% 57.9% 10.2% 51.2% 41.2% -9.9% -3.5% 16.6% 20.2%
10 Maxwell Frost D  40.2% 39.5% -0.7% 58.4% 59.2% 0.8% -18.2% -19.7% -1.5%
11 Daniel Webster R  58.4% 58.0% -0.4% 40.7% 41.0% 0.3% 17.7% 17.0% -0.7%
12 Gus Bilirakis R  66.8% 56.9% -9.9% 32.4% 42.1% 9.7% 34.4% 14.8% -19.6%
13 Anna Paulina Luna R  55.0% 56.2% 1.2% 44.1% 42.9% -1.2% 10.9% 13.3% 2.4%
14 Kathy Castor D  46.5% 54.5% 8.0% 52.4% 44.4% -7.9% -5.9% 10.1% 16.0%
15 Laurel Lee R  55.2% 59.9% 4.7% 43.4% 38.9% -4.5% 11.8% 21.0% 9.2%
16 Vern Buchanan R  57.5% 57.6% 0.1% 41.6% 41.6% -0.1% 15.8% 16.0% 0.2%
17 Greg Steube R  62.0% 61.6% -0.4% 37.3% 37.8% 0.4% 24.6% 23.8% -0.8%
18 Scott Franklin R  63.6% 58.4% -5.2% 35.6% 40.7% 5.1% 28.0% 17.6% -10.3%
19 Byron Donalds R  64.0% 64.6% 0.6% 35.4% 34.8% -0.6% 28.6% 29.8% 1.2%
20 Vacant (CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK resigned) — 36.3% 34.6% -1.7% 62.8% 64.5% 1.7% -26.5% -30.0% -3.4%
21 Brian Mast R  58.2% 57.9% -0.2% 41.1% 41.3% 0.2% 17.1% 16.6% -0.5%
22 Lois Frankel D  46.7% 54.9% 8.2% 52.4% 44.2% -8.2% -5.7% 10.7% 16.3%
23 Jared Moskowitz D  47.3% 43.0% -4.3% 51.8% 56.1% 4.3% -4.5% -13.1% -8.6%
24 Frederica Wilson D  36.6% 36.2% -0.4% 62.5% 62.9% 0.4% -25.9% -26.7% -0.8%
25 Debbie Wasserman Schultz D  46.4% 50.9% 4.5% 52.7% 48.3% -4.4% -6.3% 2.6% 8.9%
26 Mario Díaz-Balart R  63.9% 57.0% -6.9% 35.4% 42.2% 6.8% 28.5% 14.8% -13.7%
27 María Elvira Salazar R  57.1% 57.0% -0.1% 42.1% 42.2% 0.1% 15.0% 14.8% -0.2%
28 Carlos Giménez R  62.1% 62.0% -0.1% 37.2% 37.3% 0.1% 24.9% 24.6% -0.3%

Navigate Your Next Move.

We help organizations navigate complex regulatory environments using campaign-style strategy.

Don’t leave your outcome to chance.

Let’s Talk Strategy

20-minute introductory call.  No obligation.

RELATED INTELLIGENCE

Benchmark Polling: Data Driven Strategy for Victory

TL;DR - Benchmark Polling Successful public affairs & political campaigns do not happen by accident. They are the product of rigorous research and structured thinking.  A benchmark poll provides the probability of your success.Most political campaigns fail before...

The Math of Persuasion: Message Testing in Public Affairs

The Math of Persuasion: Message Testing in Public Affairs Public affairs campaigns often fail because they rely on expensive guesses. Consultants sell slogans based on what worked in the previous cycle. This approach wastes...

Social Desirability Bias: Polling and the Hidden Voter

Political polling relies on a fragile assumption: respondents tell the truth. Social desirability bias breaks this foundation. Voters provide answers they believe align with social norms or avoid perceived judgment. This psychological friction creates a gap between...