Science Friday: Evangelical Support for Trump and Church Attendance

Science Friday: Evangelical Support for Trump and Church Attendance

To the average politico, it is no surprise that 80% of self-identified white evangelical voters supported Donald Trump in 2016 – a trend that continued in 2020 where exit polls showed 76-81% of the group supported Trump. Simple explanations could explain this trend but an article I read in grad school sparked a different potential answer to such high levels of support.

Church is the most widespread form of voluntary community affiliation in the United States. An academic article titled, “Churches as Political Communities” by lead author Kenneth Wald (1988) investigated how different church settings significantly impact the political ideology of attendees. Specifically, the authors investigated 21 protestant churches in Gainesville, Florida, ranging from “universalist” themed congregations to “traditional” congregations.

Results

The big takeaway from the study is that those who attend ideologically conservative churches are 3x more likely to identify with political conservatism. Why? The reason for conservatism spreading in church settings is the socialization and face-to-face interactions among church attendees. Put more simply, the more time you spend in a certain environment, the more likely you are to absorb and conform to the values and behaviors in that environment.

Therefore, although a study has not been conducted specifically relating to support for Trump, it is entirely possible that the protestant evangelical support for Trump is directly connected to church attendance and the ideological nature of protestant congregations.

Keys to Success in the Age of Non-stop Campaigning: Digital, Data, and List Building

We are in the age of non-stop campaigning. It goes without saying that the campaign for 2022 began the morning after the November 3rd election. The key to victory? Building a data-driven, digital-first strategy to build your email list.

Emails are the golden key to successful campaigns. Emails are a direct way to identify and contact your supporters for fundraising, campaign updates, and calls to action. Most importantly, building your own list gives your campaign or organization independence – no social media bureaucrat can magically take away your ability to communicate with your audience.

 

Data-driven, digital-first strategies have transformed list building. Long gone are the days of waiting for supporters to put their name on a physical sign-in sheet at a campaign event. Rather, it is now possible to identify, target, and recruit the most likely candidates to build your list.

 

Correctly building and maintaining your database is critical for success. Often, the low-hanging fruit is individuals who have a history of donating to similar causes or candidates. Once the initial database is built-out, you have a list of interested individuals to target digitally with the goal of collecting their email addresses. 

 

Using precise, IP-targeted software, you can consistently stay in front of your target audience with highly targeted digital ads. When the ad is clicked, your target will be asked to submit their email. 

 

Our clients have had great success building their list in the months and even years leading up to an election. Beginning this process well in advance allows you to amass a list of supporters ready to activate as the election draws near.

Science Friday: Data Behind HUGE 2020 Republican Gains in Osceola County, FL

A lot of press coverage of Trump’s win in Florida surrounded the HUGE Republican gains in Miami-Dade County. Don’t get me wrong, it was critical and impressive, but the Republican performance in Osceola County is an underreported spectacle of Republican success.

Below are some graphics representing the success of Osceola County compared to other counties. I plan on exploring this data at a precinct level in a future blog.

County Comparison

From 2016 to 2020, Osceola County Republicans performed 6.7% better in terms of Presidential election vote share. This was the second highest increase in Republican vote share among all Florida counties. The two darkest counties represent Osceola and Miami Dade County. Miami Dade is at the southern tip of Florida.

 

Below is a graphic displaying the change in Republican votes from 2016 to 2020. The x-axis represents the percentage change of vote for the Republican presidential candidates. The y-axis represents the change in Republican turnout. The size of the circles represents a county’s vote share in comparison to the entire state.

In terms of raw numbers, the Republican presidential candidate received 23,228 more votes in 2020 than in 2016, compared to a roughly 12,000 vote gain for the Democratic candidate.

Ben’s Review of 2020: Political Digital Media, Research, and Data

This year, Ozean’s top staff will be presenting their own “Year in Review of 2020” comprised of their top takes in three areas: Digital MediaPolitical Research, and Political Data.

This is Ben’s review of 2020 in political digital media, research, and data.

Political Digital Media

It is no surprise that digital advertising is becoming increasingly important to political campaigns. In 2020, amid COVID-19, lockdowns, protests, and – finally – the most divisive presidential election in modern politics… digital media became NECESSARY for political campaigns.

Instead of knocking on doors, campaigns shifted to virtual canvassing. Rather than recruiting volunteers to phone bank from a central location, campaigns utilized decentralized phone systems or P2P texting applications. Boots on the ground campaigning at every level turned into virtual campaigning.

THE BIG SURPRISE: Despite the importance of digital media, social media platforms – such as Facebook – placed stringent restrictions on political digital ads in the final week of the 2020 November election. Almost two months later, now in late December, Google and Facebook are STILL banning political ads, except for ads focusing on the Georgia Special Senate Election. This ban has restricted the ability of political organizations across the U.S. to get their message out.

Political Research

The Pollster Comeback

In 2016, political polling took a shot to the ribs. In 2020, many of the same folks in the media are saying that political polling failed us yet again because pollsters underestimated how well Donald Trump would perform, despite his loss. Looking back at the 2020 election polling…  these folks are, for the most part, wrong.

At the state level, although some polls underestimated Trump’s performance, they were pretty damn accurate – often falling within a 4-point margin of error. Using Real Clear Politics polling averages as a barometer, Trump overperformed outside of the margin of error in a few states, such as Florida (+4.2), Texas (+4.5), Ohio (+7.2), and Wisconsin (+6). In other states, such as Arizona (+0.6), Pennsylvania (+0.0), North Carolina (+1.2), Michigan (+1.4), and Georgia (-1.3), polling predicted results to a tee.

Taken as an average, polling data correctly predicted the winner or fell within the margin of error in 49 of 50 states. The ONLY state that pollsters got wrong (and was outside the margin of error) was Florida.

Although some polls were particularly embarrassing to look at – like the mainstream polls that had Biden +10 to +15 in some battleground states – polling was rather accurate in predicting the 2020 results.

Find the Real Clear Politics results here.

Political Data

My biggest political data story of 2020 brings us down to my home state of Florida – Republicans in Florida have far outpaced Democrats in voter registration. I blogged about this trend in 2019, citing that if Republicans keep it up, Trump is in good shape to win Florida in 2020 and that Democrats have a shot if they push their registration lead to 500,000 (Obama-era levels).

In 2020, Republicans further closed the gap and are only behind Democrats by 116,950 registered voters. This is BIG DEAL for Florida Republicans and the Presidential election results reflect this with Trump winning the state by 2.3%… a blow-out by Florida’s standards. Not only did Florida vote for Trump yet again, but Republicans were also able to flip two Democratic Congressional seats in South Florida.

If this voter registration trend continues, the future is bright for Florida Republicans.

Alex’s Review of 2020: Political Research, Data, and Digital Media

This year, Ozean’s top staff will be presenting their own “Year in Review of 2020” comprised of their top takes in three areas: Digital Media, Political Research, and Political Data.

This is Alex’s review of 2020 in political research, data, and digital media. Three topics that caught my attention during 2020 and none of them COVID related.  Okay, some of them are COVID related.

Alex Patton is a political consultant

Digital Media

The year of the virtual campaign. 2020 was…unique and forced change into how campaigns are run. It hastened the world of dispersed technologies for volunteers and staff (phone banks, text banks), temporarily changed response rates in polling, and hastened budget swings towards digital outreach.

I think we will look back at the 2020 campaign cycle as the cycle digital media came of age.

This year, digital media spends accounted for less than 75% of total political ad spend; however, digital media experienced explosive growth (most of it in smaller donor solicitations).

As digital marketers continue to experiment with using digital in persuasion messaging, we expect digital marketing budgets to continue to grow.

Political Research

In the journal of Political Psychology, an interesting experiment caught my eye this year.

The Influence of Identity Salience on Framing Effectiveness: An Experiment conduct by Emily P. Diamond of Duke University. 

DOWNLOAD STUDY

This was an interesting online experiment beginning the explore frame effects of messaging on highly polarized topics. In this case, the author explored framing effects of identities on climate change. Specifically, if a parental identity is primed before asking about climate change would it have an effect on political behaviors?

As the study concludes, “communicating messages when partisan identities are highly salient is likely to increase polarized responses, while communicating while nonpartisan identities are salient may be helpful in depolarizing responses.”

This gels with my belief that when an issue(s) is highly polarized, going directly at it in any partisan manner will likely get you nowhere – especially if you are attempting to persuade or change behaviors.

While, there is still much work to do this in this area such as researching how long these effects linger, if at all. I mean, as soon as a partisan identity takes over – you may be back to square one.

But for now, if you want to talk about highly partisan issues with an eye to persuade or change behaviors, you may need a trojan horse, ie or a different frame.

Political Data

Google announcing the phase out of third party cookies is my data story of the year, and it was announced at the beginning of 2020. 

At the beginning of 2020, Google announced their timeline for phasing out third party cookies from Chrome.

Third party cookies are the little bits of data that companies put on your computer to “make ads more relevant” to the user….also known as “tracing them”. It is these little bits of data that allow digital agencies to target users on in individual manner.

While third party cookies have also been banned by Apple, Microsoft and Mozilla, Chrome is well over half the browser market, so this is a major change to the entire digital landscape.

The death of the cookie has been whispered about for years, and we all kinda knew it was going to happen….just not exactly when.

Now we know: Google says it is a phased approach not to take full effect until 2022.

What does this mean for digital advertising? It means first-party data is at a premium, and this move is likely to strengthen the hand of the “walled gardens” of ad tech – like….google, facebook, microsoft.

But for now, we continue to monitor the changes and watch closely how the advertising industry adjusts to a soon to be cookie free world.